CASE STUDY

Grew Paid-Search Conversions 36%
Across Two Nebraska Metros,
With Cost Per Conversion Held Near $6

+36%
tracked website conversions year over year, trailing twelve months
~$6
cost per conversion, held essentially flat while scaling
2 metros
Omaha and Lincoln covered as the program expanded
+30%
paid-search clicks to the site year over year
Sources: Google Ads (BMG), account 1270559650, trailing 12 months ending June 29, 2026 vs prior year.

Bridge to Better Living helps families across Omaha and Lincoln find the right senior-living community, a search that usually starts online during a stressful moment. Over the past twelve months we scaled their Google Ads program and expanded it to a second metro, growing tracked website conversions about 36 percent year over year while keeping cost per conversion essentially flat near $6. These conversions are website actions (visits to the Our Services and Meet Our Consultants pages, plus a small number of calls), so this is a story about more of the right families reaching the site at a steady cost, not a revenue or lead-count claim.

The Bridge to Better Living consulting team

The Results

Over the trailing twelve months, Bridge to Better Living's paid search reached more families and drove more website conversions across both Omaha and Lincoln, while cost per conversion stayed essentially flat. All figures below are volume and cost from Google Ads. We make no efficiency, revenue, or lead-quality claim, and the conversions are tracked website actions rather than verified placements or inquiries.

Tracked Website Conversions 3,439 → 4,687
Up about 36% year over year (trailing twelve months); these are website actions, mostly Our Services and Meet Our Consultants page conversions, plus a small number of calls
Source: Google Ads (BMG)
Cost Per Conversion $6.14 → $6.30
Held essentially flat while spend scaled and a second metro was added, so this is a volume story, not an efficiency claim
Source: Google Ads (BMG)
Paid-Search Clicks 7,955 → 10,308
About 30% more visits to the site from Google Ads year over year
Source: Google Ads (BMG)
Ad Impressions 87,851 → 114,290
About 30% more times the ads were shown to in-market families across Omaha and Lincoln
Source: Google Ads (BMG)

The Problem

Bridge to Better Living guides families through one of the harder decisions they will ever make: where a parent or spouse should move when living at home is no longer the right answer. That search almost always begins online, often suddenly, and the families who need the service most are the ones actively looking right now. Google Ads is how Bridge to Better Living gets in front of those families at the exact moment they start searching, across the Omaha and Lincoln metros.

The goal was straightforward and the constraint was real: reach more of those in-market families and bring more of them to the website, without letting the cost of each conversion climb as spend grew. Scaling a paid-search account often means paying more for each additional conversion, and Bridge to Better Living was also preparing to extend coverage from one metro to two. The job was to grow volume across both markets while holding cost per conversion steady.

An older couple sharing a meal, representing the families Bridge to Better Living serves
OUR GOAL

Reach more in-market families across Omaha and Lincoln and grow website conversions from Google Ads, while keeping cost per conversion steady as spend scaled.

Rather than chase a lower cost per conversion at the expense of volume, we focused on disciplined, intent-driven search coverage in both metros and expanded the program to a dedicated Lincoln campaign alongside the established Omaha campaign. We structured each market around the searches families actually use when they begin looking for senior-living help, then scaled spend deliberately so that more conversions came in at roughly the same cost per conversion rather than at a rising one. Because we expanded to a second metro partway through the period, we scope the year-over-year comparison to the trailing twelve months and treat the result as a volume gain, not an efficiency gain.

THE CHALLENGES

Growing paid-search volume across two metros without letting cost per conversion drift, and reporting the result honestly, meant being precise about what the numbers do and do not say.

Scale volume without raising cost per conversion

Adding spend usually pushes the cost of each additional conversion up. The aim was to grow conversions across both metros while keeping cost per conversion essentially flat near $6, which we did.

Expand cleanly into a second metro

A dedicated Lincoln campaign launched alongside the established Omaha campaign partway through the period, so coverage had to grow across two markets without one starving the other, and the year-over-year read has to account for that expansion.

Report the right metric honestly

The tracked conversions are website actions, mostly Our Services and Meet Our Consultants page conversions plus a small number of calls, not verified placements or form leads. The case is framed as paid-search volume at a steady cost, with no revenue, lead-quality, or return-on-ad-spend claim.

  • A high-intent, time-sensitive audience: families search for senior-living help suddenly and act fast, so paid search has to be present the moment they look.
  • Two metros to cover: Omaha was established and Lincoln was added during the period, so the program had to grow across both markets at once.
  • Cost-per-conversion discipline: the priority was holding cost per conversion steady near $6 as spend scaled, rather than chasing a lower number at the expense of reach.
  • Website conversions, not leads: the tracked actions are page conversions and a handful of calls, so the win is honestly framed as volume at a steady cost, not placements or revenue.
The Bottom Line
  • Conversions up about 36%: tracked website conversions grew from 3,439 to 4,687 year over year across Omaha and Lincoln, trailing twelve months (Source: Google Ads, BMG).
  • Cost per conversion held near $6: cost per conversion moved only from $6.14 to $6.30 even as spend scaled and a second metro was added, so this is a volume gain, not an efficiency claim (Source: Google Ads, BMG).
  • More families reaching the site: paid-search clicks rose about 30 percent, from 7,955 to 10,308, and impressions rose about 30 percent year over year (Source: Google Ads, BMG).
  • Honest scope: the conversions are website actions, mostly Our Services and Meet Our Consultants page conversions plus a small number of calls; we make no revenue, lead-quality, or return-on-ad-spend claim, and the comparison is scoped to the trailing twelve months because a second metro was added partway through (Source: Google Ads, BMG).
The Results

By scaling intent-driven Google Ads coverage across Omaha and Lincoln and expanding to a second metro, we grew Bridge to Better Living's tracked website conversions about 36 percent over the trailing twelve months while holding cost per conversion essentially flat near $6. The figures below are paid-search volume and cost only, with no revenue or efficiency claim.

Tracked Website Conversions 3,439 → 4,687
Source: Google Ads (BMG)
Cost Per Conversion $6.14 → $6.30
Source: Google Ads (BMG)
Paid-Search Clicks 7,955 → 10,308
Source: Google Ads (BMG)
Ad Impressions 87,851 → 114,290
Source: Google Ads (BMG)
Metros Covered Omaha and Lincoln
Source: Google Ads (BMG)
Paid-Search Sessions on Site (331 on-site contacts: 156 forms, 175 calls) 9,391
Source: Google Analytics 4, Paid Search channel, trailing 12 months ending June 26, 2026

Ready to get started?

Let's build the foundation that gets you found in your market.